Stability of the Greenland Ice Sheet: When the Ice Loss Becomes Irreversible
As a result of global warming, glaciers around the world are retreating. The Greenland Ice Sheet, currently the second largest ice sheet in the world, is also losing mass at an increasing rate. If it were to disappear permanently, one might ask: Could it regrow over the course of thousands of years if global temperatures were to return to pre-industrial levels?
To investigate this, researchers Malena Andernach, Marie-Luise Kapsch, and Uwe Mikolajewicz from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) have used a novel, fully-coupled Earth System-Ice Sheet Model. This model not only represents the dynamics of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, but also takes into account interactions with the atmosphere, the ocean, vegetation, solid earth, icebergs, changing river courses, and global sea levels. The team used this model to simulate the development of the Greenland Ice Sheet over up to a hundred thousand years initialized from different ice-sheet volumes. Their goal was to determine which states of the Greenland Ice Sheet are stable in the long term under pre-industrial climate conditions.
The four steady states of the ice sheet
“Our simulations show that the Greenland Ice Sheet can exist in four different steady states in a climate similar to the pre-industrial era,” says Malena Andernach, summarizing a key finding of the study. One of these states corresponds to the situation before industrialization began, with an ice volume of approximately 2.9 million cubic kilometers. “If this ice were to melt completely, it would result in a global sea level rise of about seven meters.” However, significantly smaller ice sheets with 50%, 30%, or 20% of this volume also proved stable.
The Greenland Ice Sheet stabilizes at these values due to several feedback mechanisms. The melt-elevation feedback is particularly significant: As the ice sheet melts, its surface decreases to lower elevations where it is warmer, further intensifying the melting process. In contrast, the isostatic feedback of the solid earth has a stabilizing effect. As the ice sheet’s weight decreases, the bedrock underneath the ice sheet lifts, causing the ice sheet to reach higher elevations. Smaller states are maintained also through the melt-albedo feedback: The loss of snow and ice cover exposes darker, ice-free surfaces that absorb more solar radiation, contributing to an increase in temperature. In addition to these mechanisms, changes in precipitation patterns, atmospheric circulation, and ocean temperature also play a role. Many of these processes have not been considered in simpler models.
The simulations show that, as soon as the ice volume falls below a critical threshold of 83–70% of the pre-industrial value, a transition from the current state to the next smaller state will be inevitable, even if temperatures returned to pre-industrial levels. With even lower ice volumes, larger parts of the ice sheet will be permanently lost. “This shows how sensitive the Greenland Ice Sheet is to climatic changes”, says Andernach.
Feedback loops with the Antarctic ice sheet
The study also shows that changes in the volume of the Greenland Ice Sheet can cause the Antarctic Ice Sheet to lose mass, driven by the accompanying rise in global sea level. Antarctic ice loss, in turn, impacts the Greenland Ice Sheet: According to the study, changes in the volume of the Antarctic Ice Sheet do not influence the final state of the Greenland Ice Sheet but they influence the timing of transitions between its steady states. The team’s next project is to investigate at which global temperatures or atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations these state transitions would occur.
Original publication
Andernach, M., Kapsch, M.-L., and Mikolajewicz, U.: Stabilizing feedbacks allow for multiple states of the Greenland Ice Sheet in a fully coupled Earth System – Ice Sheet Model, The Cryosphere, 20, 1047–1069, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1047-2026, 2026.
Contact
Malena Andernach
Max Planck-Institute for Meteorology
malena.andernach@mpimet.mpg.de
Dr. Marie-Luise Kapsch
Max Planck-Institute for Meteorology
marie-luise.kapsch@mpimet.mpg.de
Uwe Mikolajewicz
Max Planck-Institute for Meteorology
uwe.mikolajewicz@mpimet.mpg.de